Reported in its current location in 1832, the woman’s face on this colossal head is of particular elegance and rigid frontality. The hair framing the face is parted in the middle over the low triangular forehead, and the figure’s elongated eyes are topped by sharply defined, wide eyebrows. The sculpture seems to belong to a group of similar works inspired by fifth-century originals from the Peloponnese. The circular incision of the pupils suggests a date of the second century CE.
Borghese Collection, in room 6 in 1832 (Nibby, p. 110). Inventario Fidecommissario Borghese 1833, C., p. 51, no. 146. Purchased by the Italian State, 1902.
This colossal female head is set on a modern bust. The elongated, oval-shaped face has clearly defined features, a full chin and a strong jaw. The curve of the sharply defined brows stretches from the swollen upper eyelids to the sides of the nose, which has a broad, flat bridge. The tear ducts of the elongated eyes are clearly defined, and the pupils are marked with circular incisions. The long, thin lips, which are partially open, are slightly turned up at the corners. The figure’s hair is a mass of barely incised wavy curls, parted in the middle and gathered into two voluminous, symmetrical bands that reveal the triangle of the forehead and partially cover the ears. The hair ends in a low knot in the back (modern).
In 1832, Nibby mentioned the sculpture in Room 6: ‘in front of the door to the garden, [there is] a colossal head of Lucilla in Pentelic marble set on a cipolin rock’ (p. 110). In 1893, Venturi identified it as a depiction of Juno or Cybele and dated it to the second century (p. 42). According to Arndt, the Borghese head belongs to a group of similar sculptures inspired by fifth-century models from Corinth and Sikyon. The others in the group include one in the Museo Chiaramonti at the Vatican, one in the Richmond Collection, one in the Lansdowne House Collection and one that was found in Formia (1912, pp. 49–54). Calza agrees with Arndt’s theory and considers the sculpture a Neo-Attic variant of a fifth-century original (1957, p. 7, no. 12).
The Borghese sculpture, which differs from the Richmont-Lansdowne exemplar in its softer rendering of the forehead and from the Chiaramonti variant in its less clearly defined facial shape, seems to be datable to the second century CE, especially considering the slight incision of the pupils.
Giulia Ciccarello