Like many works of the Flemish school in the Borghese Collection, this panel was purchased by Marcantonio IV Borghese in 1783. At the time it was sold as a work by Isaac van Ostade, though critics now recognise it as a copy by an unknown artist made around the mid-18th century. The painting was certainly inspired by those works by the Dutch artist depicting domestic interiors and scenes of daily life.
The panel depicts the interior of a shop as a barber shaves a man. A number of haphazardly arranged objects brings the room to life and gives the setting a popular character. The representation is enriched by a cage hanging from the ceiling, a barrel of wine, a sleeping dog and a small boy, probably a young apprentice.
19th-century frame
Rome, purchased by Marcantonio IV Borghese from Giovanni De Rossi, 30 January 1783 (Della Pergola 1959); Inventario Fidecommissario Borghese 1833, p. 36. Purchased by Italian state, 1902.
In deposito presso la Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Palazzo Chigi, Roma.
On 30 January 1783, Marcantonio IV Borghese purchased seven paintings by Flemish artists through Gavin Hamilton. Among these was ‘a small work by Isaac van Ostade depicting a country barber, with an engraved, gilded frame’ (see Della Pergola 1959). Paola della Pergola (1959) rightly matched this description with the panel in question, which was purchased from Giovanni De Rossi, a merchant ‘specialised in this genre’ who having agreed with the English painter on the works to be sold to the prince received the total sum of 670 scudi from Hamilton.
Adolfo Venturi (1893) excluded the possibility that the work was by Van Ostade himself. The work is indeed a copy, perhaps dating to the 18th century, inspired by the oeuvre of the Dutch artist. The panel in fact bears the inscription ‘JSAAC VAN OSTADE 1686’; yet, as is well known, the painter died in 1649, years before the date indicated by the anonymous copyist. As Della Pergola (1959) proposed, the great number of Flemish works circulating in mid-18th-century Rome perhaps encouraged forgers and merchants to flood the antiques market with counterfeit paintings, which may account for the provenance of the panel in question.
Antonio Iommelli