The canvas, mentioned in Scipione Borghese’s inventory around 1633, is one of Luca Cambiaso’s many elaborate mythological works, unmistakable for the erotic connotation of his figures, particularly accentuated here by Cupid’s languid pose, portrayed lying at the foot of a tree, in an unusual image of repose.
Salvator Rosa, 112.5 x 87 x 9 cm
Rome, Scipione Borghese Collection, 1633 (inventory ante 1633, no. 67, Corradini 1998, p. 451); Inventory 1693, room, VI, no. 30; Inventory 1790, room VI, no. 7; Inventario Fidecommissario Borghese 1833, p. 39. Purchased by the Italian State, 1902.
This canvas is mentioned for the first time as part of the Borghese Collection in an inventory compiled by Cardinal Scipione, discovered by Sandro Corradini (1998) and dated 1633 circa by Stefano Pierguidi (2014). In the description, the work is correctly attributed to Luca Cambiaso (“A painting on canvas of a seated Cupid in a black and gold frame with foliage, 3 3/4 in height and 2 1/2 in width, Cangiato”). The name was confused by the compiler of the 1693 inventory (Inv. 1693, room, VI, n. 30) with that of Pomarancio, but correctly quoted both by Iacomo Manilli (1650) and in the 1760 file transcribed by Giovanni Piancastelli (see De Rinaldis, 1937, p. 226) that places the work in the city palace, precisely in the “Hall of Venuses” alongside a “Venus Caressed by Adonis, Luca Cangiassi” (inv. 317) and a “Venus and Cupid in the Sea on Dolphins” (inv. 123) by the same artist. In a catalogue of the artworks of Galleria Borghese, Paola della Pergola (1955) lists it as an original painting by the Genoese artist, and in 1958 Bertina Suida Manning likened it to the Sleeping Saint John (Genoa, Museo degli Ospedali Civili), situating it chronologically between 1560 and 1565.
The canvas depicts the god of love as a sweet, innocent boy who has laid down his bow and is allowing himself an unusual moment of rest under a tree. The position of the legs exactly recalls the pose in Venus and Cupid at Sea, with which it shares a certain “plastic rigidity” (see Magnani, 1995, pp. 92-93), both in the rendition of the shadows and in the attempt to make the scene more dynamic.
Antonio Iommelli