Like many other works executed by Flemish artists which still form part of the Borghese Collection, this painting was purchased by Marcantonio IV Borghese in 1783. It depicts a flute player, shown with several drinkers in a sparsely-furnished tavern while he plays his instrument.
The second-rate quality of this panel, whose subject fits well into the repertoire of Dutch painting, has led critics to ascribe it to a follower of Pieter de Hooch, an artist active Utrecht. In the past, the work was in fact attributed to De Hooch himself.
19th-centuruy frame, 76.3 x 91.1 x 7 cm
Rome, purchased by Marcantonio IV Borghese from Giovanni de Rossi, 1783 (Della Pergola 1959); Inventario Fidecommissario Borghese 1833, p. 13. Purchased by Italian state, 1902.
This ‘larger bombacciata by P. de Hage’ was purchased on 13 October 1783 by Prince Marcantonio IV Borghese, who paid 50 scudi for this and six other foreign works to a certain Giovanni de Rossi, a ‘merchant in this genre’ (Della Pergola 1959). Although not mentioned in the inventory of 1790, it appears in the 1833 Inventario Fidecommissario as a work by Giovanni Le Ducq. This attribution was, however, rejected by both Bürger (1866) and Harvard (1888), who favoured Jan Vermeer. For his part, Giovanni Piancastelli returned to the name of Le Ducq. Adolfo Venturi (1893) was the first scholar to propose an attribution to Pieter De Hooch, even without the benefit of the document cited by Della Pergola above. Venturi’s opinion was accepted by most subsequent critics (Cust 1914; Longhi 1928; De Rinaldis 1939; Della Pergola 1959; Peter C. Sutton 1979) and most recently confirmed by Chiara Stefani (in Galleria Borghese 2000) and Kristina Herrmann Fiore (2006).
A different theory, however, was put forth by Émile Durand-Gréville, whose view was reported by Giulio Cantalamessa in his Note manoscritte (1911-1912): according to the French scholar, the Borghese panel was executed by Quiringh Gerritsz van Brekelenkam, the Dutch painter who trained under Gerrit Dou, who influenced much of his artistic repertoire. While this thesis has the merit of keeping the work in the sphere of the Dutch school, it is marred by the fact that Brekelenkam, like De Hooch, was too skilled a painter to produce this panel, which critics have deemed as ‘not of the highest quality’ (see Della Pergola 1959).
Perhaps basing his conclusion on the opinions of Cornelis Hofstade de Groot (1909) and Lionel Cust (1914), in 1979 Peter C. Sutton confirmed that the work in question was by De Hooch himself. He further dated the work to this artist’s early career, given that before he had reached artistic maturity he based his production on mostly primary colours.
According to Cust (1914), the work in question shows the influence of Carel Fabritius. Critics have also pointed to similarities with the Soldiers with a Serving Maid in a Barn in the Johnson Collection in Philadelphia (see in this regard Valentiner 1929).
Antonio Iommelli