This portrait, inserted in a non-ancient, loricate bust, is of unknown provenance. The head, which is slightly turned to the right, portrays a boy of about ten or twelve years old, with an oval face, a small, closed full mouth and large eyes with thin, well-defined eyelids framed by broad, arched eyebrows. Most of his forehead is covered by a thick fringe with swallow-tail locks described with short incisions. Although the sculpture does not provide enough information to securely identify the person portrayed, it could be a portrait of a Julio-Claudian prince (perhaps Britannicus?), if not a private portrait inspired by official portraiture.
Borghese Collection, Inventario Fidecommissario Borghese, 1833, C, p. 44, no. 50. Purchased by the Italian State, 1902.
This portrait, inserted in a non-ancient, loricate bust, is of unknown provenance. In 1820, it was restored by Felice Festa, who also worked on other busts earmarked for display in Room I in niches high up on the walls, as part of the ambitious installation of the new collection in the Casino of Villa Pinciana.
The head, which is slightly turned to the right, portrays a boy of about ten or twelve years old, with an oval face, a small, closed full mouth and large eyes with thin, well-defined eyelids framed by broad, arched eyebrows. Most of his forehead is covered by a thick fringe with swallow-tail locks described with short incisions. According to Paolo Moreno, the portrait depicts a member of the Julio-Claudian family, based on physiognomy and the treatment of the hair. More specifically, he argued that it is a portrait of Britannicus, son of Claudius and Messalina and born in 41/42. As we read in Suetonius, he was his father’s favourite and marked as his successor. The boy, of poor health, was murdered in 55, shortly after his father’s death, simplifying the rise to power of Nero, son of Claudius’s wife Agrippina the Younger and Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus and adopted by Claudius in 50 CE. The iconography of Britannicus has not been definitively established. We know from inscriptions that his portrait was included in the imperial images of the time. His likeness is only preserved in a few rare sestertii, most of which are of poor quality and difficult to read. The simultaneous circulation of portraits of Nero has complicated the attribution of portraits to one or the other (see Poulsen 1951; Amedick 1991; De Maria 2015; for more recent reinterpretations, see Pollini 2021). Moreover, the portrait sculptures that can be attributed to the young prince with some certainty show him at four or five years old (see Getty Villa, inv. 82.A.A; Musée d’Art ed d’Histoire, Genève inv. C186) or at most eight (see the portrait from Velleia, MAN Parma, inv. 826; on the various attributions, see Pollini 2021, pp. 256–257, note 96).
Although the Borghese head does not provide enough information to securely identify the person portrayed, as is often the case with portraits of children from this period, it could be a portrait of a Julio-Claudian prince, if not a private portrait inspired by official portraiture.
Jessica Clementi