The compositional arrangement of this portrait allows us to connect it to more famous models by Bronzino; at the same time, the rendering of the subject and the ingenuity of several aspects of the artist’s approach suggest that it may be an older work. The toga allows us to identify the man as a magistrate; he holds a letter in his hand, on which we can read several words whose interpretation is problematic
Salvator Rosa ( 117 x 96.5 x 7 cm)
Rome, Borghese Collection, 1833 (Inventario Fidecommissario Borghese 1833, p. 28). Purchased by Italian state, 1902.
The provenance of this work is still unknown. Its presence in the Borghese Collection is documented beginning in 1833, as it can be identified in the lists of the Inventario Fidecommissario as the panel ascribed to Bronzino. This attribution was accepted with some reservations by Adolfo Venturi (1893) but rejected by Giovanni Morelli in favour of the Tuscan painter Jacopo Carucci, called Pontormo (Morelli 1897).
Bypassing the question of attribution, in 1926 Frederick Mortimer Clapp dated the portrait to between 1538 and 1543; on this basis, he deciphered the writing visible on the letter in the hand of the portrayed subject as follows: ‘A. born.le Me Fala.. Canepini... Jacini orafo... In firenze [and on the part folded over] Lui’: in 1959, Paola della Pergola corrected ‘Lui’ to the name ‘Guido’.
Della Pergola (1959) in fact published the painting as a work by a ‘Tuscan master’. Her judgement was most likely influenced by Roberto Longhi: basing his assessment on the quality of the execution, in 1928 Longhi suggested that the work could be an imitation of an older painting by Cristofaro dell'Altissimo, who was known to have made copies of many of the portraits in Paolo Giovio’s collection. Although later critics have not given consideration to his theory, it remains the most valid hypothesis on the question of attribution.
Antonio Iommelli