Portrait of Agrippa
This portrait of Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa comes from Palazzo Borghese in Campo Marzio, where it was held together with 15 other busts that made up the series. It has been displayed in Room 4 of Villa Pinciana since at least 1832. The head in red porphyry is mounted on an oriental alabaster bust.
The Roman general was Augustus’s right-hand man. His representation here for the most part reproduces the known features of his physiognomy, within the limits faced by the sculptor to give shape to the porphyry, a material characterised by its particular hardness.
Object details
Inventory
Location
Date
Classification
Period
Medium
porphyry and oriental alabaster
Dimensions
Provenance
Included in decoration of the Gallery of Palazzo Borghese in Campo Marzio between 1674 and 1676 (H. Hibbard, ‘Palazzo Borghese Studies. II, the Galleria’, The Burlington Magazine, 104 (1962), p. 11 no. 12); Inventario Fidecommissario Borghese 1833, C, p. 49, no. 111. Purchased by Italian state, 1902.
Conservation and Diagnostic
- 1995/1996 C.B.C. Coop. a.r.l.
Commentary
Turned slightly to the left, Agrippa’s face shows conspicuously arched eyebrows, a forehead grooved with wrinkles and well-defined lips below a pronounced philtrum. A dimple is clearly visible in his protruding chin. He wears a paludamentum, fastened on his right shoulder with a round fibula and draped in flattened folds; the garment is similar to those portrayed in some of the other busts of the series ascribed to Giovanni Battista della Porta (inv. no. LIII). Part of Agrippa’s breastplate, shaped like a lion’s head, covers his right shoulder.
The facial features are the typical ones of the iconography of Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa, known through numerous ancient busts. In these, the paludamentum – the mantle worn by Roman generals when they commanded the army – was an essential attribute in this case, given that the subject led the troops in the conquest of Egypt in 30 BC. While on the one hand his physiognomy here seems to derive directly from a Roman precedent – namely the bust which Pope Pius IV gave to Lorenzo de’ Medici in 1471 (Uffizi Gallery, Florence) – on the other his hair shows differences compared to ancient images of Agrippa: in this case he is not depicted with the usual locks of hair over the forehead but rather as bald.
The work is displayed in Room 4 of Galleria Borghese together with 15 busts in porphyry and alabaster from the family’s palazzo in Campo Marzio. Here they were once located in the gallery, framed by a plaster decoration made by Cosimo Fancelli between 1674 and 1676. According to documents from the Borghese Archive, the series was composed of the ‘Twelve Caesars’, with the addition of Nerva and Trajan as well as second versions of Vitellius and Titus (Vatican Secret Archive, AB, b. 5688, no. 15, published in Hibbard 1962, appendix, doc. I, pp. 19-20). In 1830 Nibby saw the series when it was still in Campo Marzio, describing the works as ‘16 busts with heads in porphyry, representing the 12 Caesars and 4 consuls’. Two years later, when they had been moved to Villa Pinciana and displayed along the wall of Room 4, he listed them as Trajan, Galba, Claudius, Otho, Vespasian (two exemplars) Scipio Africanus, Agrippa, Augustus, Vitellius (two exemplars), Titus, Nero, Cicero, Domitian, Vespasian, Caligula and Tiberius; this catalogue was confirmed by the 1833 Inventario Fidecommissario.
Yet if this description (which includes a second Vespasian, executed by Tommaso Fedeli in 1619 and transferred from the Gladiator Room) corresponds to the current state of the series, we are left with several uncertainties: to begin with, we must ask what happened to the busts of Caesar, Titus and Nerva, which were present in 1674-76 but do not form part of the series today; secondly, we must wonder who the fourth consul referred to by Nibby in 1830 could be, given that currently only three are represented (Agrippa, Cicero and Scipio Africanus); and finally, we must inquire where the busts of the consuls came from. It is therefore possible that the sculptures displayed in the gallery, which were already present in Palazzo Borghese, did not correspond to those envisioned for the iconographic programme of the vault: this discrepancy may indeed account for the errors of identification in our sources. In that case, as Hibbard suggested, the bust of Agrippa may have been used in place of that of Julius Caesar (1962, p. 11 no. 12). The theory of possible substitutions is supported by the common date of execution of the busts, which critics believe were all sculpted in the same period during the 17th century (Faldi 1954, pp. 16-17; Della Pergola, 1974; Moreno, C. Stefani, 2000, p. 129; Del Bufalo 2018, p. 116).
Sonja Felici
Bibliography
- P. de’ Sebastiani, Viaggio curioso de’ palazzi e ville più notabili di Roma, Roma 1683, p. 26.
- F. Deseine, Description de la ville de Rome en faveur des étrangers, Lyon 1690, II, p. 50.
- P. Rossini, Il Mercurio errante delle grandezze di Roma, tanto antiche, che moderne, Roma 1693, p. 41.
- G.P. Pinaroli, Trattato delle cose più memorabili di Roma tanto antiche come moderne, che in essa di presente si trovano, Roma 1725, III, p. 12.
- F. de’ Ficoroni, Le singolarità di Roma moderna, Roma 1744, p. 51.
- G. Roisecco, Roma antica e moderna, Roma 1750, II, p. 109.
- R. Venuti, Accurata, e succinta descrizione topografica, e istorica di Roma moderna, Roma 1766, p. 170.
- M. Vasi, Itinerario istruttivo di Roma e delle sue adiacenze, Roma 1794, I, p. 392.
- C. Fea, Nuova descrizione di Roma antica e moderna e de’ suoi contorni, sue rarità specialmente dopo le nuove scoperte cogli scavi: arricchita delle vedute più interessanti, Roma 1820, II, p. 481.
- A. Nibby, Itinerario di Roma e delle sue vicinanze, vol. 2, Roma 1830, p. 360.
- A. Nibby, Monumenti scelti della Villa Borghese, Roma 1832, p. 95.
- A. Nibby, Roma nell’anno MDCCCXXXVIII. Parte seconda moderna, Roma 1841, pp. 919-920.
- Beschreibung der Stadt Rom, a cura di E. Z. Platner, III, 3, Stuttgart-Tübingen 1842, p. 249.
- E. Pistolesi, Descrizione di Roma e suoi contorni, Roma, Gallarini, 1852, p. 385.
- Indicazione delle opere antiche di scultura esistenti nel primo piano del Palazzo della Villa Borghese, Roma 1854 (1873), I, p. 19.
- A. Venturi, Il Museo e la Galleria Borghese, Roma 1893, pp. 33-34.
- A. De Rinaldis, La R. Galleria Borghese in Roma, Roma 1935, p. 13.
- A. De Rinaldis, Arte decorativa nella Galleria Borghese, in “Rassegna della Istruzione artistica”, 10-11-12, 1935, pp. 311-319, in part. p. 318.
- A. De Rinaldis, Catalogo della Galleria Borghese in Roma, Roma 1948, p. 25.
- P. Della Pergola, La galleria Borghese in Roma, Roma 1951, pp. 14-15.
- I. Faldi, Galleria Borghese. Le sculture dal sec. XVI al XIX, Roma 1954, pp. 16-17, cat. 11, fig. 11b.
- H. Hibbard, Palazzo Borghese Studies. II, the Galleria, in “The Burlington magazine”, 104,1962, pp. 9-20.
- Le collezioni della Galleria Borghese, a cura di S. Staccioli, P. Moreno, Milano 1981, p. 103.
- K. Fittschen, Sul ruolo del ritratto antico nell’arte italiana, in Memoria dell’antico nell’arte italiana, II, I generi e i temi ritrovati, a cura di S. Settis, Torino 1985, pp. 383-412.
- D. Di Castro Moscati, Il porfido rosso antico, una esclusività romana, in “Gazzetta antiquaria”, 1, 1987, pp. 42-48.
- P. Moreno, C. Sforzini, I ministri del principe Camillo: cronaca della collezione Borghese di antichità dal 1807 al 1832, in “Scienze dell’Antichità”, 1, 1987, pp. 339-371.
- E. Fumagalli, Palazzo Borghese: committenza e decorazione privata, Roma 1994.
- Galleria Borghese, a cura di A. Coliva, Roma 1994, p. 15.
- Guida alla Galleria Borghese, a cura di K. Herrmann Fiore, Roma 1997, p. 43.
- D. Batorska, Designs for the Galleria in Palazzo Borghese in Rome: new proposals, in “Paragone”, 48, 1997(1998), pp. 26-45.
- M.C. Marchei, Alabastro egiziano o cotognino, onice, in Marmi antichi, a cura di G. Borghini, Roma 1997, pp. 140-141, cat. 4; Porfido rosso, Ibidem, p. 274, cat. 116.
- P. Moreno, C. Stefani, Galleria Borghese, Milano 2000, p. 129, fig. 2.
- V. Curzi, Allestimenti di dimore romane tra Seicento e Settecento: un itinerario nella tradizione classicista dell’Urbe, in Il capitale culturale, Supplementi 8 (2018), pp. 301-316, in part. 305-306.
- D. Del Bufalo, Porphyry. Red imperial porphyry. Power and religion, Torino 2018, p. 116, n. H79.
- Scheda di catalogo 12/01008636, S. Pellizzari 1983; aggiornamento S. Felici 2020.
