The work, which dates back to 1613, was painted in Rome, evoked here through the dome of St. Peter’s visible in the background. The painting depicts Minerva, goddess of wisdom, who has just laid down her weapons to put on a sumptuous feminine dress. Recognisable in the background, in a vanishing point prospective, are the staff, olive tree and owl, the warrior goddess’ usual attributes.
19th-century frame with a frieze decorated with lotus flowers and palmettes, 293 x 224.5 x 11.5 cm
Rome, Scipione Borghese Collection, 1613 (Della Pergola 1955, p. 35); Inventario Fidecommissario Borghese 1833, p. 11. Purchased by Italian state, 1902.
In esposizione temporanea alla Galleria Nazionale d'Arte Antica per la mostra "Raffaello, Tiziano, Rubens. Capolavori dalla Galleria Borghese a Palazzo Barberini"
The painting was made by Lavinia Fontana in 1613, as is suggested both by the inscription – which appears beneath the foot of the seated cherub – and by a payment by Cardinal Scipione made out to Annibale Durante, the carpenter of the Borghese household, for a frame ‘[…] for the Pallas by Mrs Lavinia Fontana, 13 spans high by 8’ (Della Pergola 1955, p. 35). The work was either purchased by or donated to Scipione (Herrmann Fiore 2018). It was certainly painted in Rome by the eminent Bolognese artist, as is indicated by the dome of St Peter’s Basilica visible in the background. The view of the church is partially obstructed by a dark wall, which highlights the delicate features of the goddess of wisdom.
The first mentions of the work are found in a text by Domenico Montelatici from 1700, who describes it as an ‘idea of Titian’s’. In spite of the fact that the date and the signature were clearly visible at the time, in 1818 Mariano Vasi attributed the work to Padovanino, a designation which was later upheld by Antonio Nibby (1824), Giovanni Piancastelli (1891) and Adolfo Venturi (1893) but forcefully rejected by Roberto Longhi (1928) and Giuseppe Fiocco (1926), who rather proposed Girolamo Forabosco as its creator. While Aldo De Rinaldis (1939) attributed it to the seventeenth-century Veneto school, in 1955 Paola della Pergola justly recognised that the painting was the work of the Bolognese artist, basing her opinion on documentary analysis. Critics then accepted this attribution, in particular Eleanor Tufts, who in 1974 noticed a similarity between the landscape of this work and that of Fontana’s The Visit of the Queen of Sheba to King Solomon, held by the National Gallery of Ireland (inv. no. 76).
The painting depicts Minerva in an unusual way. She is not only the goddess of wisdom and the arts but also – according to mythology – protectress of spinners, as appears to be suggested by the precious garments that the divinity is about to put on. At her feet are visible a shield and armour: these, together with the owl on the bannister in front of the olive branches and the helmet held by the cherub, are among her typical iconographic attributes. In the view of Silvia Urbini (1994, p. 207), the subject of this work has its source in two texts of the sixteenth century: Vincenzo Cartari’s Le imagini degli Dei degli Antichi (‘The images of the gods of the ancients’) and Achille Bocchi’s Symbolicae questiones, a work published in Bologna in 1555 containing several engravings by Andrea Alciati and Giulio Bonasone, which probably inspired the subject of this painting.
Several years earlier, in 1604-5, the artist painted a similar work, which today forms part of the Pavirani Collection in Bologna. It was commissioned by Marco Sittico Altemps, whose name – as Patrizia Tosini recently discovered (2019, pp 225-228) – appears in the 1605 poem by Ottaviano Rabasco, entitled La Pallade ignuda della famosa pittrice Lavinia Fontana (‘The nude Pallas by the famous painter Lavinia Fontana’). The commission of this work, which was painted in Bologna and Rome, was certainly linked to that of our Minerva Dressing, which Scipione Borghese requested several years later: after seeing the painting mentioned in the poem at the house of Altemps, Borghese probably asked the painter for a similar subject, which would surely have to be on a par with those works of his rich collection that depicted Venus.